Portfolio case study
A governed implementation workflow that turns messy requirements into grounded, reviewable delivery work while keeping people accountable for the decision.
Proof claims
12
Offline eval cases
15
Build provenance
Source evidence
Implementation teams receive requirements in inconsistent formats, then spend time translating them into scope, plans, tasks, customer updates, and operational handoffs. The Workbench makes that translation inspectable: retrieval sources become opaque citations, model output is schema-validated, repair is recorded as evidence, and no delivery mutation happens before a human approval.
This repository is an end-to-end portfolio implementation: product workflow, multi-tenant data model, AI evidence pipeline, background-job reliability, enterprise control APIs, infrastructure-as-code, tests, and public proof are maintained together so architectural claims remain inspectable.
The default path is intentionally reproducible without paid cloud credentials: LocalStack, PostgreSQL, deterministic mock generation, and synthetic tenants exercise the same boundaries as the AWS shape. Live-provider cost and staging reliability are withheld unless matching telemetry and CI provenance are attached, and generation remains a proposal until a separate reviewer approves it.
AI output stays a proposal until a human approves it
Grounded plans link inspectable AI evidence
Tenant boundaries are enforced in application and database layers
At-least-once delivery and failure are first-class states
AI quality claims are backed by a reproducible offline suite
Enterprise identity lifecycle is standards-ready
Outbound integrations are signed, retryable, and tenant-scoped
Data lifecycle controls are explicit and inspectable
The local workflow maps cleanly to an AWS-native production shape
Request-to-worker correlation is part of the operating model
Staging reliability is measured against explicit service targets
Public staging smoke verification